Carly Fiorina must be pleased that her message is getting through. The opening keynote at Gartner Symposium/IT Expo here at Sydney's Darling Harbour Exhibition Centre was all about "agility," Gartner's "new" term for the dynamic enterprise.
Agility is of course one of HP's marketing terms. Ever since IBM started its On Demand campaign well over a year ago, HP has been attempting to define its own version of what's basically the same thing. In short, enterprises build powerful network infrastructures coupled with service-oriented architectures (SOAs), and enabled by the industry-wide push to develop Web services standards. HP's term for all this was the Adaptive Enterprise.
A few of Gartner's slides contained that phrase. I was having flashbacks from when I sat in on HP's Adaptive Enterprise launch in Silicon Valley. Now, Gartner might well come back and argue they owned the term "Adaptive Enterprise" first. Either way, it felt odd to hear what sounded like HP marketing bandied about instead of IBM's.
Also confusing from this morning's re-hash of everything we already know about app dev, was the surprise comeback of the portal. That's right, Gartner has decided that the enterprise portal is the panacea for how enterprises will achieve "agility."
Certainly the portal does have a valuable role to play in certain multi-app environments. But what I didn't get was how portals will help the business analyst of the future create new business processes on the fly by "drawing lines" between objects that represent individual services and components.
Around 18 months ago I saw a very long and complex demo of such a system designed for business analysts by the now defunct Commerce One. In theory, it's a great idea. Need to tweak your inventory management process? Under this model, no Java or .Net programmers are required. But Commerce One had a custom app to handle this process.
So if we're ultimately meant to evaluate custom apps vs portals as the method by which enterprises will become "Agile" then I guess the portal wins today - there are far more portal vendors in existence than e-commerce dinosaurs like Commerce One or old foe Ariba.
But in the end I didn't feel like Garnter made a strong enough case for the portal. A couple of industry people I talked with agreed with me. One commented that feedback he'd heard from CIOs exiting the keynote was they were not hearing anything new.
Here's hoping the tutorials and Gartner one-on-one's make up for lost ground.
Recent Comments